🔗 Share this article

Following a significant legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an order issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the regulator petitioned the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. It first determined the content was "refused classification", a rating that empowered the commissioner to order social media companies to restrict access to the posts for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted widespread discussion". The platform drew a parallel between the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board revised the rating of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of entertainment and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public years after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had subsided".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this decision to defend freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but noted that the revised classification now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians who are minors".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the content were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, platforms have been instructed to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.