🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most famous photographs of the twentieth century portrays a naked girl, her hands extended, her features twisted in terror, her skin blistered and peeling. She appears running towards the photographer while fleeing an airstrike in South Vietnam. Nearby, other children are racing away from the bombed community in Trảng Bàng, with a background featuring dark smoke along with military personnel.

This Worldwide Influence from a Seminal Image

Just after the distribution in June 1972, this image—originally named "The Terror of War"—evolved into a traditional hit. Viewed and analyzed by countless people, it's generally credited for energizing public opinion critical of the American involvement in Vietnam. One noted critic subsequently commented that the deeply indelible photograph of the young the subject suffering possibly had a greater impact to heighten global outrage toward the conflict compared to a hundred hours of broadcast barbarities. An esteemed English war photographer who documented the fighting described it the single best photograph of what became known as the media war. A different veteran combat photographer stated how the image stands as in short, among the most significant images ever taken, particularly of the Vietnam war.

The Long-Held Claim Followed by a New Allegation

For half a century, the photograph was assigned to Nick Út, a young local photojournalist working for an international outlet during the war. However a provocative new film streaming on a global network contends which states the iconic photograph—often hailed to be the apex of war journalism—might have been shot by a different man present that day in Trảng Bàng.

As presented in the film, The Terror of War was actually photographed by a stringer, who sold the images to the AP. The assertion, along with the documentary's resulting research, stems from a former editor an ex-staffer, who states how the powerful bureau head directed him to alter the image’s credit from the stringer to Nick Út, the only employed photographer there that day.

This Investigation for the Real Story

The source, now in his 80s, reached out to an investigator recently, seeking help in finding the uncredited photographer. He mentioned how, should he still be alive, he hoped to give a regret. The filmmaker reflected on the unsupported photographers he had met—seeing them as the stringers of today, who, like independent journalists during the war, are frequently marginalized. Their work is often questioned, and they operate under much more difficult circumstances. They are not insured, no retirement plans, they don’t have support, they often don’t have adequate tools, and they are extremely at risk while photographing within their homeland.

The journalist pondered: “What must it feel like to be the man who took this photograph, should it be true that Nick Út didn’t take it?” As a photographer, he speculated, it would be profoundly difficult. As a follower of the craft, especially the celebrated documentation of Vietnam, it might be reputation-threatening, perhaps legacy-altering. The respected heritage of the image within the diaspora was so strong that the filmmaker whose parents left at the time felt unsure to engage with the investigation. He said, “I didn’t want to disrupt this long-held narrative that Nick had taken the picture. Nor did I wish to change the current understanding among a group that had long admired this accomplishment.”

The Search Develops

But the two the journalist and his collaborator felt: it was important raising the issue. “If journalists are going to hold others in the world,” said one, it is essential that we be able to ask difficult questions about our own field.”

The investigation documents the investigators as they pursue their research, from discussions with witnesses, to public appeals in modern the city, to archival research from additional films taken that day. Their work eventually yield an identity: a driver, employed by NBC that day who occasionally sold photographs to international news outlets as a freelancer. In the film, a moved Nghệ, currently in his 80s based in the United States, states that he sold the image to the news organization for minimal payment and a copy, but was troubled without recognition over many years.

This Backlash Followed by Ongoing Scrutiny

The man comes across throughout the documentary, reserved and calm, but his story became controversial among the field of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to